Australian Bush Fires Play into Hands of Climate Alarmists

Now that the term global warming has fallen into disrepute largely because global warming is slow low it's almost immeasurable, climate change has become the new save the world religion.

As even blind Freddy knows, climate is the average of weather, and weather, and thus climate, change from hour to hour, day to day, week to ... well, you get the idea. You've seen it change your whole life.

Nowadays, any time there is a weather event that looks like it might help the climate alarmists, they hop on board and make outrageous claims about how governments should have done more, or should fix the problem.

So, when the annual Australian fires began in November, climate alarmists, true to form started rabbiting on about how if only the government had stopped coal mining, brought us back to the Medieval age with no power, only candles, everything would have been better.

Then the Australian Institute of Criminology produced this interesting pie chart:

 According to the AIC, 48% of our fires are caused by humans and there is another 37% suspicious meaning they could also have been started intentionally. If the 37% were in fact lit by arsonists, that's 85% of fires caused by humans.

Every summer we have fires. Failure of backburning because of Green's policies implemented by Leftist local government bodies has meant there was a huge load of very dry, very combustible materials to ignite. And it did ignite for one reason or other.

Aided by wind created by (too many wind turbines - I'm joking yes), climate change, the fires have been particularly ruthless and fast to spread over wide areas.

To think that we humans can change the weather at this stage of our development is like thinking we can walk on water.

Robin

OK, Milennial: In defence of Baby Boomers

I thought this article was a pleasant response to the #OKBoomer crowd.

https://www.theage.com.au/business/the-economy/ok-millennial-in-defence-of-baby-boomers-20191206-p53hgp.html

Robin

#OKBoomer
#thisboomerslife

A Gender Neutral Santa?

My mind boggles! What in the world would a gender-neutral Santa look like?

Will it be a Santa with no beard and face covered so you can't see if it's male or female? Maybe with a voice synthesizer so you can't hear whether the voice is soft and sweet like a woman (are we even allowed to use that word anymore?) and not husky and hard like a - you know, the other gender?

As the progressives amongst us try their hardest to get rid of gender or convince us that there are 92 different genders - or something like that, some of us are convinced there are still only two genders.

Maybe we're wrong. Maybe things aren't what they seem and gender is no longer binary. It's so long since I've seen up some young ladies dress, I really can't say that there hasn't been a vast evolutionary change in the last 10 years (yes, it's been a while). Maybe I'll need to ask my grandson to give me a rundown on what the current state of gender diversity is.

But, I'm getting off the mark - back to the GN Santa. I think I've got it. It, the GN Santa, would wear a neck to toe-nail smock, loose-fitting so no shape or bumps could be seen, and completely covered head, all in red and white of course. Only a post box slit would be visible for the eyes - much like the dress preferred by moslem women in many backward countries.

No perfume would be worn and the GN Santa would need to communicate via a whiteboard and pen - otherwise, the voice might be a giveaway.

It sounds like a bag of fun. I'm so glad that I'm no longer a Santa follower and that both my children and grandson are all adults and don't need to worry about visiting Santa either. 

If you come across a GN Santa, please take a photo and send it to me so I can see how accurate my guess description was. 

Stay sane.

Robin
#okboomer
#thisboomerslife 

Just Another Stabbing in London?

Jack Merritt - BBC Photo

Stabbings seem to be a common occurrence in London, but most are apparently related to criminal behaviour, not terrorism.

Jack Merritt was murdered for a different reason; he was an infidel and according to the Koran, followed by over one billion of our planet's inhabitants, infidels need to be oppressed and pay tax to their superior moslem oppressors, or be killed.

Many moslems choose to bypass the oppression opportunity and kill people. This has been going on for 1400 years and will doubtless continue until people become heterodox in their beliefs or Islam is abolished.

Christianity had an ugly side, expressed mainly in the Old Testament, however, somehow it progressed and now stoning for adultery and other barbaric ideas have become obsolete in Christianity. 

Unfortunately, we humans have still not evolved to the stage where we could throw off the shackles of religion and see the universe and our world for what they truly are, beautiful places full of mystery and magic.

It's always sad to read about people being killed in senseless violence, especially when, like Mr Merritt, they had so much to contribute and so much more life to live. I sympathise with Mr Merritt's family and friends who must be devastated. There are other families involved who also need our sympathy.

Is it time to ban the Koran in Western countries and establish a collective of countries who will work to force modernisation of Islam, which is what many heterodox moslems are also calling for?

Encouraging violence is an offence in most jurisdictions of which I'm aware and the ugly Koran is full of it. Enough is enough.

Robin

PS: How does one justify freedom of religion when the religion is full of hatred and violence?