Goodbye Net Zero?

 

The more I read about the deteriorating energy situation in the UK and Europe due to an over-reliance on so-called renewable, green energy - wind and solar, I'm beginning to see the end of Net Zero.

Since leaving full-time work in 2012 and retiring (Goodness me, is it really a decade?) I've had time to read extensively about global warming (now climate change), renewable energy, and associated topics.

My opinion, following that reading, is that global warming has been so low, it's negligible. Carbon dioxide is more benefit to the planet and humans than stated and there is no link between temperature and C02.

Additionally, evidence is that we are heading for a cooling period (climate is cyclical, not linear) and more people die from hypothermia than hyperthermia. Remember Texas? Something around 700 people died during 2020-21 due to power failures and lack of warmth although there were debates about actual numbers. Even one unnecessary death is too much.

Claims by alarmists since the 70s of life-ending, world-destroying heating events have not eventuated, not on even one occasion.

Now, as a result of government decisions based on dodgy scientific advice, billions of pounds have been wasted on wind turbines and decommissioning of coal-fired power stations. The UK imports billions of pounds worth of gas from Russia and elsewhere so that it can avoid gas fracturing at home.

Most of the components of wind turbines are manufactured in China which has an open-slather agreement when it comes to C02 emissions. Strange that. We simply move our emissions to somewhere else so we can claim to be "green".

The public is beginning to become aware of the vast cost to their countries to implement an unnecessary, unhelpful Net Zero by 2050 policy and a fight back has begun.

The war in Ukraine has also helped people reconsider their energy needs and futures.

Goodbye Net Zero!

Robin

"Follow your own dogma, not that of others. Live your own life, your own way."

The New Woke Order

The stable, sensible, friendly society we once knew seems to be unravelling at a great rate. 

The Left-wing/Marxists are gaining ground as they knowingly or unwittingly help implement the World Economic Forum's (WEF) Great Reset. A reset that will be disastrous for most men and beasts, although the beasts won't have to put up with the stupidity or the totalitarianism because they live in ignorant bliss.

The WEF is an unelected body run by the incredibly wealthy, so-called "elite", masterminded by Klaus Schwab and supposed to ensure we will, "own nothing, owe nothing and be happy".

Sounds wonderful doesn't it?

You'll live in a world where technological automation has taken over your job, productive organisations instead of elected governments run the show, and you receive a Universal Basic Income to keep you in a suspended state of dependant poverty. Dependant on the oligarchs who will be ruling the roost. 

There's still no such thing as a free lunch. If you are reliant on someone else to provide your income, they control your life. That's what the non-so-great Great Reset is all about, control.

The UN, WEF and others have been preparing us for this for decades and all the changes we see in society are leading us into the lion's den. 

We've managed to insinuate many of the UN's Agenda 21/30 aspirations into our communities already. 

"Over 20 goals comprise the "new world order" the United Nations will focus on as part of its "Agenda 21/2030 Mission Goals," according to the claim. Items on the agenda include one world government; a single cashless currency; government-owned and controlled schools, colleges and universities and an end to single-family homes." (HREF)

The "wokeism" to which we are currently inundated is part of this platform. The idea that the stupid vegan activist has in the capture above, calling animals by a pronoun, is part of a significant problem we have with Leftists trying to convince us that gender is "fluid" and "assigned after birth", not as a result of birth. Even Australia's premier science organisation, the CSIRO has adopted this lie, they have reportedly implemented special leave provisions for staff who are gender reassigning and now agree that it's not biology that determines gender, but the gender a person decides to adopt. How many genders that includes, I'm not sure.

I do know, it's an unusual stance for a supposedly scientific organisation to adopt, but it seems that government agencies and some private sector organisations bend over backwards to adopt any of the latest politically correct, woke ideologies pushed by the Marxists. Critical race theory, historical revisionism, climate alarmism, gender fluidity, and even the latest religion of Net Zero.

As rainfall that Australia's Principal Scientist, Tim Flannery once said would never fall again, inundates much of our east coast, some of our fellow citizens blame unfortunate Prime Minister, Scott Morrison for not managing the climate as if he could wave a wand and tell it all to behave.

These people vote and breed, probably offspring like the lady shown above - half-wits and morons.

Next, some true believer will tell us if we had implemented a carbon tax, none of this flooding would have occurred. Our species is intelligent, but as yet not intelligent enough.

I'm glad that I'm much closer to taking that journey from which nobody returns than I am to beginning a journey. I feel sorry my children and grandson will have to put up with this nonsense. It seems to get worse each week.

Robin

It's becoming too expensive to drink in hotels

The tax on alcohol is again increasing making the very occasional trips I take to a pub, even less occasional.

In South Australia where a 475 ml schooner is called a pint (I'm not sure if it's pretending to be an Imperial pint or a metric pint), drinkers are already at a disadvantage. It's the only state in Australia where 475 ml is considered a pint. (See here.)

I pay between $7 and $10 for a pint of beer at present. The $7 rate is a special rate one hotel provides an in-house branded beer for and it's not always available. So, it's usually $9.50 or $10 for a pretend pint. So a night out with four or five beers is $50.

You can buy a carton of 375 ml beers (24) for around $50 or pay more for boutique and special beers. Some beer comes in 30 can size and costs less than or a little more than $50.

At just over $2 per unit for the 24 can pack or $1.60 per unit for the 30 pack cans, buying your packaged beer and drinking at home or from your own stock is much less expensive than hotel drinking. You don't have to pay for fuel to get there and back - fuel is also becoming increasingly expensive - and if you don't have a non-drinking wife like I have, you may also have to take into account not driving while inebriated.

God knows what the new prices will be, but they will no doubt have an impact on the number of people drinking and the volume being consumed at hotels. Another blow to an industry that has faced the rigours of surviving during COVID-19.

My trips to the hotel will definitely become less frequent and I'll probably have a maximum of two pretend pints.

Robin

Dr Roy Spencer's Global Warming Graph

 

Dr Roy Warren Spencer is a meteorologist, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on NASA's Aqua satellite. He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center. He is known for his satellite-based temperature monitoring work, for which he was awarded the American Meteorological Society's Special Award. (Source: Wikipedia)

Every month Dr Spencer issues an update to the graph at left that shows how the global lower atmosphere temperatures are changing. You can see the original here.

You don't have to be a climate scientist to understand the graph, the figures speak for themselves.

Robin