Wednesday, 13 October 2021

How to Disable Western Countries - the Great UN Plot

You've heard the term, "Chickens have come home to roost." Well, it's happening in Europe, the UK and elsewhere as I type.

The UN's Agenda 2030 and Lima Agreement are having some success in the Western free enterprise, democratic systems.

Youths have been educated to believe the UN's policies are beneficial to them and the planet. They now believe there are none or dozens of genders and that they can choose their gender.

Children are being indoctrinated to believe that C02 is a dangerous gas and that climate change due to that and global warming will lead to extinction of the human race in 12 years. 

Some young adults have decided not to have children. Others don't want to eat meat because of the methane cattle exude.

Humanity is in a mess brought about by Leftist progressive nonsense.

Now the chickens are beginning to come home to roost as the following items indicate.

1) Europe asking Russia for more coal to survive winter energy crunch

Bloomberg, 30 September 2021
 
2) Britain's energy sector in meltdown as leading energy supplier faces collapse
The Guardian, 30 September 2021

3) Renewable energy output drops almost a third
Financial Times, 29 September 2021
  
4) China braces for a chilly winter as its home-grown energy crisis intensifies
The Sydney Morning Herald, 30 September 2021
 
5) Gavin Mortimer: Boris should beware his Red Wall doesn't become a Yellow Vest
The Daily Telegraph, 30 September 2021
 
6) Kate Andrews: Britain’s weak energy security puts net zero in doubt
The Daily Telegraph, 29 April 2021
  
7) And finally: Will Net Zero bring down Joe Biden?
The Wall Street Journal, 29 September 2021

Robin

Monday, 27 September 2021

The Great UK C02 Shortage

While the rest of the world is bending over backwards to rid the planet of the life-giving, odourless, colourless, invisible gas that represents 0.04% of atmospheric gasses, the UK has a shortage in some industries.

If it wasn't so serious it would be hilarious.

In the UK there is a shortage of C02 because plants that produce fertilizer can't get sufficient energy to run their plants, an output of which is C02 used in fizzy drinks, the meat industry, and elsewhere.

Those politicians, paid "scientists" and media brightsparks who have slandered C02 as a dangerous gas that we need to reduce by 2050 - an impossible task - are responsible for the destruction of Western energy systems, directly or indirectly.

The UK is the last of several countries to find that wind turbines and solar won't provide the amount of energy required to run modern economies. Trillions have been spent on subsidies, payments to turbine companies to switch off (can you believe that?) Now, the UK looks like having an unhappy winter.

The only way to rid the planet of the nonsense that we can save the planet by killing off our reliable coal, nuclear and gas supplies and replacing them with solar and wind is for those of us fortunate enough to vote, to elect governments who know that the global warming/climate change nonsense being pushed by the IPCC and others is a farce.

How anyone, scientist or gifted amateur, can calculate a pathway to exactly a 1.5 degree Celsius increase in temperature or think they can control the climate by reducing C02 is a mystery. The UK is finding out the hard way.

Robin.....


Thursday, 23 September 2021

Those Dangerous Roads

In the Barossa Valley there has been a lot of press about an intersection where two traffic incidents occurred within a matter of weeks. As I understand it, nobody was killed, but injuries occurred. 

The intersection has a lot of heavy truck traffic and was controlled by stop signs. The local council, in its wisdom, replaced the stop signs with give-way signs. This was considered to be an error that was increasing the danger within the intersection. After much public reaction, the council was pressured by public opinion to remove the give-way signs and replace them again with stop signs.

Numerous people said the intersection was "dangerous" and that stop signs would prevent crashes from occurring. Good luck with that.

One thing I discovered during 12 years of police service, four of which were spent full-time investigating traffic incidents where fatalities or evidence of dangerous driving occurred, is that it doesn't matter how straight, how good a surface, how many signs or road markings there are on a road, drivers will still manage to crash.

The cause of 99%* of traffic incidents is drivers. Let me say that again; drivers cause crashes. Not roads. Not signs.

There are people who wilfully disobey stop signs and give-way signs in the same way there are people who use mobile phones while driving (inattention), and consume drugs or alcohol before driving. There are also people who have a propensity to collide.

If drivers disobey give-way signs and can't manage to avoid traffic travelling on an interesection road, why would we expect drivers not to disobey stop signs? In fact, everywhere I drive, I see people who don't stop at stop signs.

According to the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Australian Standard 1742) stop signs are used when there is a visibility problem or other feature that requires a driver to stop.

I've attended dozens of traffic incidents (mostly fatalities) where people have failed to stop.

I hope the so-called dangerous intersection doesn't have any more crashes, but I know where I'd place my bet.

Robin

* I'll discuss a fatality I attended that was brought about by mechanical failure next post and two where people weren't wearing seat belts that probably prevented them from dying.


Monday, 20 September 2021

What does Jesscia REALLY want?

 

Jesscia, which is probably a misspelled Jessica keeps sending me these emails that end up in my spam folder. The screen capture at left is one day's worth of spam from Jesscia.

Some moron sitting in Africa, Russia or somewhere else is pumping out millions of these spam messages daily. And there are plenty of others of various types promising large sums of money, unsubscription from porn sites and on it goes.

If Jesscia was really contacting me to see her naked pictures, wouldn't she just send one message? Why send multiple messages every day? She must think she's special.

As you'd expect, I never click on any of these messages. If I want to, I can see plenty of naked women online without risking my computer and the data I have stored thereon.

My email client always sends these annoying messages to the spam folder. Why don't they just delete them? Every day I receive the same lot of stupid messages.

Does anyone ever click on these? Somebody must be doing so otherwise the spammers would probably stop. 

In the meantime, I'm getting so much spam I'm thinking about changing my email address. Also, the "Have I Been Pwned" site tells me that my email address has been spread far and wide through security leaks.

If you haven't done so, take a look at Have I Been Pwned to see if your address has been compromised.

Good luck.

Robin